Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

tion 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act instructs that Commerce ``may use any reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated, including averaging the estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for the exporters and producers individually investigated.'' In this administrative review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for each of the mandatory respondents, Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk) and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai), that is zero percent, and we did not calculate any margins which are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Thus, in accordance with the expected method, and consistent with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle,\5\ we are assigning a dumping margin of zero percent, consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, to the non-selected companies under review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle) (holding that Commerce may only use ``other reasonable methods'' if it reasonably concludes that the expected method is ``not feasible'' or ``would not be reasonably reflective of potential dumping margins''). ------------------------------------------------------------------