ShadowBuys

Federal Register · Regulatory notice

Regulation Crypto Assets

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."

Follow COIN
Became public
Aug 21, 2026
Event / period date
Aug 21, 2026
Collected
Nov 8, 2026, 7:42 PM EST

Why this is connected

The source explicitly mentions Coinbase Global, Inc.. A mention alone does not establish a financial benefit.

Source evidence

Read the source excerpt or record
ng ``investment contract.'' See 15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1); 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10). The definitions are ``virtually identical'' in the Securities Act and Exchange Act and are treated by the courts as identical in ``decisions dealing with the scope of the term.'' Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth, 471 U.S. 681, 686 n.1 (1985). Under the Howey test, the term ``investment contract'' means any contract, transaction, or scheme whereby a person invests money in a common enterprise and reasonably expects profits to be derived from the essential managerial efforts of others. Howey, 328 U.S. at 298-99. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the years following the DAO Report, the Commission and its staff continued to address ICOs (and crypto assets in general) on an ad hoc basis.\26\ Consistent with the DAO Report, the Commission's general approach was to apply the Howey test to determine whether a crypto asset, in the context in which it was being offered and sold, constituted or was subject to an investment contract. If the crypto asset constituted or was subject to an investment contract, then the issuer of the investment contract was expected to comply with the existing Federal securities laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See, e.g., Gladius Network LLC, Release No. 33-10608 (Feb. 20, 2019); Paragon Coi

Congressional trading in COIN

These disclosures provide context. Their presence does not establish a link between a trader and the event.

Original documents control. Public records can be amended, and company connections may require interpretation. Nothing here is investment advice.