United States et al. v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

th the Final Judgments with the standard of proof that applies to the underlying offense that the Final Judgments address. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Each Plaintiff State retains enforcement authority with respect to actions by any Defendant that impact egg sales in the Plaintiff State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paragraph XI.B provides additional clarification regarding the interpretation of the provisions of the proposed Final Judgments. This Paragraph provides that Defendants may be held in contempt for failing to comply with any provision of the proposed Final Judgments that is stated specifically and in reasonable detail, regardless of whether the provision is clear and unambiguous on its face, and that the proposed Final Judgments should not be construed against either party as the drafter. Paragraph XI.C provides that if the Court finds in an enforcement proceeding that a Defendant has violated the Final Judgment, the United States may apply to the Court for an extension of the Final Judgment, together with such other relief as may be appropriate. In addition, to compensate American taxpayers for any costs associated with investigating and enforcing violations of the Final Judgment, Paragraph XI.C provides that, in any successful effort by the United States or a Plaintif