Streamlining Probationary and Trial Period Appeals

 grant unduly restricted agencies' ability to conduct probationary assessments by introducing the possibility of multiple rounds of administrative review and subsequent judicial review in a Federal appellate court. While the CSRA does include a comprehensive remedial scheme, which may include judicial review, this review is limited. The CSRA provides that ``[t]he reviewable agency actions are removal, suspension for more than 14 days, reduction in grade or pay, or furlough for 30 days or less.'' Elgin, 567 U.S. at 5-6. But courts have repeatedly dismissed a litany of other actions arising under the CSRA (including, but not limited to, those relating to the APA). For example, in United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439 (1988), the Court said ``the absence of provision for . . . employees to obtain judicial review is not an uninformative consequence of the limited scope of the statute, but rather manifestation of a considered congressional judgment . . . This conclusion emerges not only from the statutory language, but also from what we have elsewhere found to be an indicator of nonreviewability, the structure of the statutory scheme.'' Similarly, in Zummer v. Sallet, 37 F.4th 996 (5th Cir. 2022), the court held the CSRA prohibits district courts from hearing claims seeking to reverse suspensions and terminations. Indeed, for decades, courts have consistently held ``that it would be