ShadowBuys

Federal Register · Regulatory notice

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category-Unmanaged Combustion Residual Leachate

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is proposing a Clean Water Act (CWA) regulation to revise the technology- based effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) promulgated in the 2024 "Supplemental Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category" (2024 ELG). This proposed regulation for the steam electric power generating point source category applies to unmanaged combustion residual leachate (CRL) at existing sources and is estimated to reduce costs by $446 to $1,090 million dollars annually at a 3 percent discount rate.

Follow WY
Became public
May 18, 2026
Event / period date
Not stated
Collected
Nov 8, 2026, 12:37 AM EST

Why this is connected

The source explicitly mentions WEYERHAEUSER CO. A mention alone does not establish a financial benefit.

Source evidence

Read the source excerpt or record
 pollutants. In specifying BPT, the EPA looks at a number of factors. The EPA first considers the cost of achieving effluent reductions in relation to the effluent reduction benefits. The Agency also considers the age of equipment and facilities, the processes employed, engineering aspects of the control technologies, any required process changes, non-water quality environmental impacts (NWQEIs, including energy requirements), and such other factors as the Administrator deems appropriate. See CWA section 304(b)(1)(B), 33 U.S.C. 1314(b)(1)(B). 2. Best Available Technology Economically Achievable BAT represents the second level of stringency for controlling direct discharge of toxic and nonconventional pollutants, after BPT. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has referred to this as the CWA's ``gold standard'' for controlling discharges from existing sources. Sw. Elec. Power Co., 920 F.3d at 1003. In general, BAT represents the best available, economically achievable performance of facilities in the industrial subcategory or category. Consistent with the statutory language, the EPA considers technological availability and economic achievability in determining what level of control represents BAT. CWA section 301(b)(2)(A), 33 U.S.C. 1311(b)(2)(A). Other statutory factors that the EPA considers in assessing BAT are the cost of achieving BAT effluent reductions, the age

Congressional trading in WY

These disclosures provide context. Their presence does not establish a link between a trader and the event.

Original documents control. Public records can be amended, and company connections may require interpretation. Nothing here is investment advice.